On Jun 27, 11:28=A0am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Mr. Smartypants wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 8:12 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Dutch wrote:
> >>> Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, THE one and only Goo - lied and
> >>>> presented no challenge:
> >>>>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Rudy B. Canoza wrote:
> >>>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, THE one and only Goo - lied and
> >>>>>> presented no challenge:
> >>>>>>> "We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether existing
anima=
ls
> >>>>>>> "benefit" from living." - Rudy
> >>>>>> That's correct
> >>>>> =A0 =A0 How do you think your supposed pre-existent "entities"
> >>>> No, Goo - YOUR supposed "pre-existent entities". =A0YOU are the one
=
who
> >>>> started talking about "denying" them life.
> >>>> The *only* reason there has been any talk of "pre-existent
entities"=
,
> >>>> Goo, is because "they" are fundamental to your ****witted view of
> >>>> animals. =A0YOU introduced the topic, Goo.
> >>> Salt talks about them in The Logic of the Larder.
> >> Sorry, I was unclear. =A0I meant that Goo - ****wit David Harrison,
th=
e
> >> one and only Goo - was the first one to use the idea here, and that
hi=
s
> >> entire stupid story depends on "them". =A0As you've no doubt seen,
Goo=
and
> >> runny both say that I'm the one who believes in them, but that's
clear=
ly
> >> a lie. =A0Goo is the one whose story depends on them.-
>
> > Yet Boobs has offered up many posts in which he shows a belief in the
> > existence of the pre-existent state..........in spite of the fact that
> > he denies it exists.
>
> Have you read The Logic of the Larder?-
Is that the Bible of the religious sect you and Boobs belong to?
|
