On Jun 27, 8:12=A0am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Dutch wrote:
> > Rudy Canoza wrote:
> >> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, THE one and only Goo - lied and
> >> presented no challenge:
>
> >>> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Rudy B. Canoza wrote:
>
> >>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, THE one and only Goo - lied and
> >>>> presented no challenge:
>
> >>>>> "We ARE NOT, and NEVER WERE, talking about whether existing
animals
> >>>>> "benefit" from living." - Rudy
> >>>> That's correct
>
> >>> =A0 =A0 How do you think your supposed pre-existent "entities"
>
> >> No, Goo - YOUR supposed "pre-existent entities". =A0YOU are the one
wh=
o
> >> started talking about "denying" them life.
>
> >> The *only* reason there has been any talk of "pre-existent entities",
> >> Goo, is because "they" are fundamental to your ****witted view of
> >> animals. =A0YOU introduced the topic, Goo.
>
> > Salt talks about them in The Logic of the Larder.
>
> Sorry, I was unclear. =A0I meant that Goo - ****wit David Harrison, the
> one and only Goo - was the first one to use the idea here, and that his
> entire stupid story depends on "them". =A0As you've no doubt seen, Goo
an=
d
> runny both say that I'm the one who believes in them, but that's clearly
> a lie. =A0Goo is the one whose story depends on them.-
Yet Boobs has offered up many posts in which he shows a belief in the
existence of the pre-existent state..........in spite of the fact that
he denies it exists.
|
