McD's original has it as Anavitrinella; maybe the Hodges list was the first
to mis-spell it?
Cheers
Chris
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Christian Schmidt, Ph.D.
(613) 715 - 5429 / schmidtcb@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Canadian Food Inspection Agency
Entomologiste, Agence canadienne d'inspection des aliments
Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids & Nematodes/
Collection nationale canadienne d'insectes, arachnides et nématodes
K.W. Neatby Bldg. / l'édif. K.W. Neatby
960 Carling Ave / 960, avenue Carling
Ottawa CANADA K1A 0C6
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> Hugh McGuinness <hmcguinness@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 05/23/08 7:07 am >>>
Hi Gary,
I thought you were having a joke with us, but then I cut and pasted your
two
spellings into a word do***ent at font size 30 and could see the
difference:
Anavitrinella versus Anavitrinelia
All old sources I have say the former, except for Hodges 1983 checklist
which uses the latter. So I guess someone will have to check McDonough¹s
1923 publication in which the genus was erected, however: Anavitrinella is
a
replacement for Vitrinella so one could presume that he meant
Anavitrinella.
Can¹t wait to hear the answer.
Hugh
On 5/23/08 4:02 AM, "Gary Anweiler" <gganweiler@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> (Anavitrinelia and Anavitrinella)
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
|
