"Handsome "Jack" Morrison" <handsomejackmorrison@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
news:rp1044p4oemigebk2lss26gnl3roqb58sk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 30 May 2008 13:51:41 +0100, Phil Odox
> <philodox@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 29 May 2008 19:48:56 GMT, "\(the\)duckster"
<duckster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>wrote:
>>>"Handsome "Jack" Morrison" <handsomejackmorrison@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I mean, Phil, if you can't pick up your own dog, what kind of
>>>> relation****p is that?
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, you didn't see the pictures of great big Phil rolling
>>>around
>>>the garden with this sprite of a dog.
>>
>>Being "great big" with huge, heavy hands carries certain disadvantages
>>where small pups are concerned, and that's why I have to be
>>particularly careful. Biff only weighs in at 2.9kg.
>
> I don't know how big you are, but I'm 6'4", about 240, and have "huge,
> heavy hands" myself.
>
> I also breed and raise and train Labs (and a few CBRs), and have
> always considered my huge, heavy hands to be an advantage when
> handling even teeny tiny retriever puppies, that weigh but a few
> ounces when they're born.
>
> I've done this for about 50 years now, and at no time have I ever
> created a hand-shy dog. And they're handled almost constantly from the
> moment they're born. I'm not exactly Mikhail Baryshnikov, but I'm not
> a klutz either. Of course you have to be careful, but you're making a
> mountain out of a molehill.
>
> Actually, I agree with Melinda (and that happens only once every
> twelve to thirteen years). I think you're just a smart-ass, which is
> okay, but I really hate wasting my time. You don't really want
> advice. You enjoy the sound of your own voice too much for that.
>
> So, again, good luck with your puppy.
>
> You just might need it.
>
> --
> Handsome "Jack" Morrison
>
> What Is Going On At Trinity Church?
> http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/5/29/9431/74527
>
> "So we repeat: when it comes to health care, re****ters must keep one eye
> on the Democrats."
>
http://www.cjr.org/campaign_desk/watch_the_democrats_part_ii.php?page=all
>
> Jimmy Carter. America's worst president, and worst former president.
> <spit>
> http://ace.mu.nu/archives/265066.php
>
> Americans are paying a terrible price for the Democratic Party's
perverse
> energy policies.
> http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/05/020589.php
>
> Barack Obama: The Whiner's Choice. Toughen up, buttercup.
>
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/19/now-campaign-statements-are-off-the-table-too/
>
http://rightwingnuthouse.com/archives/2008/05/18/more-whining-from-obama/
>
> "Never before in human history, though, has a new generation simply
failed
> to appear."
> http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/JE20Dj05.html
>
> Can anyone vouch for Mark Shaw's whereabouts at 11:00 a.m. Saturday
> morning?
> http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hU4ax39rFCnqHnipVp5TCGP6TKqgD90NJ26G0
>
> "Two substantive political issues are the federal budget deficit and the
> war
> in Iraq. Now, if you're electing Democrats to control government
spending,
> then
> you're marrying Angelina Jolie for her brains. This leaves the Democrats
> with
> one real issue: Iraq. And so far the best that any Democratic
presidential
> candidate
> has been able to manage with Iraq is to make what I think of as the high
> school ***
> promise: I will pull out in time, honest dear." P.J. O'Rourke
|
