"Janet Boss" <janet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:janet-1BF76C.14202508072008@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <6dhp3kF2mf4fU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> "CatNipped" <CatNipped@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't buy it. My allergist told me I have the most severe allergies
to
>> cats that he's ever seen. I love cats (all cats, not just somebody's
>> idea
>> of a "pretty" cat), so I take allergy pills every day.
>
> You're a very small sample. How I wish that "allergy pills" did the
> trick. I don't think you know enough about allergies and apparently you
> wouldn't dream of being friendly to someone who chose a purebred cat, so
> I guess any success stories with Siberians vs other cats wouldn't be
> something you're ever likely to believe.
>
>>
>> >
>> > Lastly, where are the [actual] statistics that say that if someone
>> > cannot purchases a purebred kitten, that they'll adopt a shelter cat
>> > instead? That argument doesn't hold water for cats anymore than it
>> > does
>> > for dogs.
>>
>> I really *hope* they don't. Someone who wants a pure-bred cat is not,
in
>> my
>> opinion, fit to own the epitome of predatory perfect that is a moggie.
>
> Ah yes - I called that right in my answer, above. Wow.
>
>> If
>> they are so worried that their cat doesn't match their furniture that
>> they
>> refuse to accept a moggie in their life, all moggies are better off
>> because
>> of it!
>
> Nothing to do with matching furniture. You are fulfilling a horrid AR
> agenda here. I find that so disappointing. Real facts, real concerns
> and real action are so much better than hysteria and banning.
>
You're so full of ****. Your allergies "cannot be controlled" with
medication simply because it suits your pro-breeding agenda.
You see animals as objects with which you imagine you may elevate your
social status. You should not even bother to try, because everyone can
*see*
what you are. Pathetic.
|
