I am still thinking about how I feel about GW. These are storms caused by
a
variety of things. The main one I see is people crowding too close to the
rivers. The build the things to keep water back but, in the end, the
river
always wins. Some around here filled in their water shed places in their
fields so they would have more farm ground. Result, no place for water to
go.
"Cory" <my_wheel_life@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:MPG.22bcdeb371ba6c6c989776@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In article <6bgllkF3c3tlqU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, spaz@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>> Considering Iowa got flooded in 93, I think, I must really be math
>> impaired
>> not 100 years there. I will never forget the sight of two houses where
I
>> had spent a lot of time, they went flowing down the Mississippi river.
>> Just
>> made you sick.
>
> FWIW, the episode of TWW that I was referring to made a point of saying
> that the glacier that melted was just another sign of global warming.
> Thus, given the fact that Iowa's been flooded at least twice now since
> the early 90's, I'm just now beginning to be a believer in the global
> warming argument. I always thought it was a bunch of poppycock.
> However, this flooding is so stupidly massive, wide-spread, and close,
> date-wise, to other periods of recent flooding, that I don't think so
> much anymore that the global warming argument is poppycock.
>
> --- Cory
>
> --
> http://my-wheel-life.vox.com/
|
