Caelan wrote:
> On Jul 8, 9:26 am, Eileen Morgan <eg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Guys, she *cannot* medicate the horse or have the vet out without the
>> permission of the horse's connections--and they have been notified of
>> the issue and seem unconcerned. Sucks but there it is. Legal Nightmare
>> if she treats someone else's horse . . .
>>
>> Eileen Morgan
>> The Mare's Nesthttp://www.themaresnest.com
>
> Thank you, Eileen, for understanding my concern. The horse's agent has
> been out to inspect him. She handled him, noted the heat in his feet
> etc and, as you say, basically couldn't have cared less. The owner was
> presumably notified and would have my contact information, but no one
> has contacted me. I cannot legally medicate or treat the horse. I am
> not the registered owner of the horse. We are making him as
> comfortable as possible by bedding on sand and cold hosing, but there
> is nothing more we can do without the owner's permission.
OK, I may have missed something here....why was this horse not
immediately taken back to where it came from? If it's on trial, the
trial should have immediately been over and the horse refused. (I
probably wouldn't have even taken it on trial until the "stone bruise"
had healed and the horse was sound at the dealer's)
Sharon Potter
Red Branch
|
