On 7/9/08 11:25 AM, "Caelan" wrote:
> On Jul 8, 9:26 am, Eileen Morgan <eg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Guys, she *cannot* medicate the horse or have the vet out without the
>> permission of the horse's connections--and they have been notified of
>> the issue and seem unconcerned. Sucks but there it is. Legal Nightmare
>> if she treats someone else's horse . . .
>>
>> Eileen Morgan
>> The Mare's Nesthttp://www.themaresnest.com
>
> Thank you, Eileen, for understanding my concern. The horse's agent has
> been out to inspect him. She handled him, noted the heat in his feet
> etc and, as you say, basically couldn't have cared less. The owner was
> presumably notified and would have my contact information, but no one
> has contacted me. I cannot legally medicate or treat the horse. I am
> not the registered owner of the horse. We are making him as
> comfortable as possible by bedding on sand and cold hosing, but there
> is nothing more we can do without the owner's permission.
Okay, I have to say something.
You are both offically wrong. Take care of the horse, suck up the vet
bill,
and be a man/woman. WTF????
Pay for the ****ing vet and get over it. The horse is more im****tant than
your fear of legal issues.
There, vent over.
Jody
|
