Re: cont. Parrot worked to Death?

Bob,
This ain't the original Jynx its an imposter. Writting style attitude ect
aren't even close.

Dave

"Wheeler" <rivercst@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:13hidf84cfkfm54@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dave chill, MJ is a morphing freak who just loves to stir things up, we
call
> folks like that Trolls and he has hooked you.  MJ has had more asshole
> identies than you can count, once he is ignored he fades back into
oblivion,
> feed him and he will get more and more nonsensical.
>
> Bob W
>
> "Dave Bugg" <davebugg2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:FtaSi.205$dr4.79@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > M.J. wrote:
> >> "Dave Bugg" <davebugg2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:dF5Si.50$_55.28@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>> You simply tried to play  a game of over-reaching and pathetic
> >>> whining, slander against pepperberg, and a lame attempt at a
> >>> speculative conspiracy without fact one to back-up  your
> >>> stupendously arrogant assumptions.
> >>
> >>
> >> I suspect your confusion stems from a lack of understanding
> >> that people here, on pet parrot newsgroups, myself included,
> >> are parrot owners and pet parrot lovers, who's loyalties are
> >> to the parrot kind and not to the bird researchers or parrot
> >> scientists like you may find on a scientifis animal resreach
> >> forum.
> >
> > You smarmy, patronizing tertiary syphylitic idiot, I've been a
participant
> > on RPB for over 8 years now. I own parrots, and have a bonded
relation****p
> > with each. The only loyalty I have is to fact, reason and truth; none
of
> > whose charachteristics you possess. You have an unreasoned hatred of
> > animal research that has been proving by your op****tunistic glomming
onto
> > Alex's death, and irrational suppositions.
> >
> >> My questions and hints at critisisms are originating purely
> >> from a pet parrot owners perspective.
> >
> > Bull**** of infinite depth. Being a pet parrot owner has nothing to do
> > with your postings. There are many parrot owners, myself included, who
> > refuse to buy into your incoherent babblings.
> >
> >> This is self evident,
> >> I assumed, and incorectly thought there is no need for any
> >> pre-disclosures.  Apparently there are people in need of
> >> such.
> >
> > And apparently you fogot to put on your aluminum-foil hat and panties.
> >
> > -- 
> > Dave
> >
> >
>
>