Talk About Network

Google





Pets > Pets Dogs Telepathic Yogi > The Rep. Shape*...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 1538 of 1593
Post > Topic >>

The Rep. Shape****fter. Part 3.

by "johnfw" <johnfw@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Nov 9, 2008 at 11:01 PM

Subject: The Rep. Shape****fter.  Part 3.                 Nov. 9, 2008.

  This talks about the comments of some humans when they read this
material.

.......................................................................
.......................................................................

  A minivan with British markings and the imprint of a Europe-wide
supermarket chain parked in front of my house. I noticed the same
minivan again on several occasions traveling at a distance behind my
car, even when I visited the town of ...... 65 kilometers away. When
I returned, the car was on the other side of the street once again. I
never saw anyone get into or out of the car. A knock on the door of
the vehicle and on the tinted windows caused no reaction of any kind.
  After about two weeks, the minivan disappeared again. When I
informed E.F. personally about these events, he suggested that I
change the place and date of the meeting in order to assure our own
and Lacerta's safety. The meeting took place on April 27, 2000 in
another isolated location. It was unobserved as far as I can
determine.
  Once again, all of this may sound strange and paranoid, like a
fantasy from a cheap science fiction film; however, I can only repeat
to and assure the reader once again: all of this is the unadulterated
truth. Believe my word or don't believe them. These things have
happened and they will continue to happen, whether you believe it or
not. Until it is too late. Our civilization is in danger.
Ole. K. - May 3, 2000

----------------------------------

  Transcript of the Interview (Shortened Version)
  Date: April 27, 2000
  [Comment by Ole. K.: The meeting began with an appraisal of diverse
questions and opinions which I had gotten from readers of the first
transcript in anonymous fa****on through distribution from my
trustworthy friends. Some of these opinions-all together there were
over 14 pages of paper-contained comments shaped by everything from a
radically religious to a fanatical tendency to welcome contact with a
reptilian species. Some of these comments contained stereotypical
phrases like "Servants of H-ll" or "Species of the Ev-l One". I don't
want to go into any kind of detailed description here since I don't
want to pass on further any false and radical realm of thought.]
  Question: When you read these re-igious and animosity-ridden
comments here, what do you think and feel then? Is the relation****p
between your species and ours really shaped from that kind of total
negation?
  Answer: Does it amaze you that I am not completely angered by
that? I had fully expected those kinds of extreme reactions. The
programming for the utter negation of another species (especially the
reptilian species) as in your own case is deeply embedded in each of
your own individual consciousnesses. This ancient conditioning stems
from the days of your third artificial creation and, biologically
speaking, is passed down as an information genome from generation to
generation. The identification of my species with the powers of
darkness was a primary intention of the Illojiim, who liked seeing
themselves in the role of the powers of light-something which in and
of itself represents a paradox, since that humanoid species was
extremely sensitive to your sunlight. In case you were expecting me
to act offended, I guess I'll have to partially disappoint you. These
obscure intentions are not really your fault; you are simply
following for the most part what you have inherited from your
ancestors. It is indeed actually somewhat disappointing that many of
you develop no especially strong individual self-conscience, for this
would help you to overcome the conditioning. As I already said, we
were in direct contact in the last several centuries with some of
your more primitive human tribes; these tribes had themselves
succeeded in breaking through the old "creation programming;" they
were able to meet us without tension, hate and total rejection.
Apparently many of your modern civilized individuals are not in a
position to think on their own, but rather let themselves be guided
by programming and relig-on (which is also a manifestation of that
ancient programming and part and parcel of the plan of the Illojiim).
  Therefore, comments of that kind I'd sooner regard as amusing than
irritating; they simply confirm in large measure for me my
suppositions about your defined mode of thinking.
  Question: Therefore, you are not the "Species of the Ev-l One" as
was remarked earlier?
  Answer: How am I supposed to answer that? Your people still think
according to a simple and completely inappropriate scheme of
generalizations. Simply put, there are absolutely NO purely -vil
species. There exist in every terrestrial and extraterrestrial
species alike both good and e-il individuals; it's even true of your
own people; but there is NO such thing as an absolutely ev-l species.
This conception is really very primitive. You people have believed
from time immemorial what you are supposed to believe-what was
foreseen for you to believe by your creators. Every well-known
species, even the more highly developed ones, consists of a great
number of individual consciousnesses (at least a ****tion of the
consciousness is individual, even though there are connecting fields
of consciousness); these self-sufficient spirits are able to decide
freely for themselves a lifestyle which is either good or ev-l,
according to your own human standards. It depends again on the
respective point of view; your people are not necessarily in a
position to judge whether the deeds of a much more highly developed
species are good or evi-, because you stand at a lower observation
point, from which an *****sment is not possible. Your simple words
"good" and "evi-" are in any case examples of a tendency towards
generalization; in my language there are many concepts for the
various shades of meaning of individual behaviors in comparison to
the norms of a society.
  Even those extraterrestrial species which are inclined to act with
antagonism towards you are not "Species of the -vil One," even though
they operate negatively with respect to your own r-ce. They do this
for their own reasons and do not regard themselves as ev-l; were your
structured way of thinking more linear and more focused as theirs is,
then you would also behave in such a fa****on. The attitude of a
species towards other kinds of existence naturally depends very
heavily on its respective structured way of thinking; each species
sets its own priorities. To classify that as "good" or "ev-l" is
really quite primitive, for the survival of any species argues for
many varieties, among them your own, as well as for even the most
varied of the worst or negatively-directed deeds. I won't even
exclude my own kind in this regard, for there have been certain
occurrences in the past which I don't personally welcome, but about
which I would also not like to go into detail. None of these
occurrences have happened in the last 200 years of yourtime scale.
But please note the following: there are NO absolutely good and
there are NO absolutely bad species, because each and every species
always consists of individuals.
  Question: In the letters that I got, there was often the question,
whether you could go into any greater detail regarding the advanced
physics that you commented on last time. Many people said, your words
made no sense. For example, how do UFOs function, how do they fly,
how do they perform the maneuvers that they do?
  Answer: I ought to explain that to people? That's not all that
simple. Let me think about it for a minute. I always have to use very
simple words in order to make clear to you the basic principles of a
higher kind of science.
  Let's try this: You have to be clear about some fundamental facts.
The very first thing is that you must divide up the conception of the
physical world because each existence consists of different layers;
let's say for simplicity's sake that it consists of a material
illusion and a sphere of influence. {TRANSLATOR'S NOTE: No legitimate
translation exists for this word 'Feldraum'; "Feld" means "field,"
"Raum" means "space, room, expanse." Therefore, I'm translating it as
"sphere of influence."} Certain physical conditions are associated
only with the realm of the material {as in 'concrete'}, while other
and more complicated conditions are associated only with the sphere
of influence of the material world. Your conception of the physical
world is based upon a simple material illusion. That illusion is
further subdivided into three elementary or basic conditions of
matter. A fourth and very im****tant condition also exists, which you
simply pay attention to more or less as you choose; it is the one
bordering on the sphere of influence or plasma realm. For you, the
theory for a controlled transformation or an elevation of the
frequency of matter and the stable existence of this fourth
aggregate condition of matter is not very common, or it exists at a
very prmitive level. (As an aside, there are simply five states of
matter, but the post-plasma state would really be going too far and
it would only serve to confuse you. Besides, it is not necessary for
an understanding of the basic theory; it is connected with diverse
phenomena which you would characterize as paranormal.) Now, back to
the essentials: Plasma...now, with plasma I don't mean just "hot
gas"-as the concept is generally simplified by your people-but rather
I mean a higher aggregate condition of matter. The plasma state of
matter is a special form of matter which lies between its real
existence and the sphere of influence, that is, a complete loss of
mass and pure accretion of energy of various form whenever matter is
"pushed or shoved." {NOTE: No explanation was given for the use of
the word "pushed, shoved" as used in this context. Your guess is as
good mine.}

Part 3.

John Winston.   johnfw@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 




 1 Posts in Topic:
The Rep. Shapeshifter. Part 3.
"johnfw" <jo  2008-11-09 23:01:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 5:13:05 PST 2009.