On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 05:57:49 -0400, "Economics"
<economy@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>"the 2nd coming of christ" <jesucristo2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>news:46974fee.315671388@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:36:30 -0400, dh@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> >>>>> Then just say whether you suck up to the beast or you deny
>> >>>>>his existence.
>>
>> I'll suck up to the Beast any day before I suck up to any false
>> Christ-image manufactured for the purpose of manipulating the
>> m*****.
>>
>> >>>>i don't know what beast you are referring to here. i only believe
>> >>>>in myself and the beast within myself, not in any cartoon
>> >>>>character fabricated by the christians.
>> >>>
>> >>> At this point my impression is that the concept of Lucifer (or
>> >>>what/who ever) is included in the Old Testament, and that is
>> >>>what/who is Satan. That means the idea was around long
>> >>>before Christianity.
>>
>> One has to question the validity of any Christian interpretation
>> as ****trayed in an English translation of the Old Testament. The
>> Hebrew language is very complex and where the word Satan appears
>> in a Christian bible, there more than likely are a number of
>> possible meanings associated with the actual Hebrew word in
>> question that are not being properly understood. One cannot go to
>> a Christian translation of Hebrew writing and expect that it is
>> going to be a valid representation of what those Hebrew authors
>> were trying to convey.
>>
>> > Christ changed things, and unless you accept what he
>> >changed there will be things you could never understand.
>> >Of course even if you accept them you'll never be able to
>> >understand everything, but you would still be a lot better off
>> >than you are now if it's all for real. If it's all just bull**** then
>> >it makes no difference what anyone thinks.
>>
>> To me Christ is just a myth.
>
>Well, if you write the year 2007 on your checks, that is how many years
>since Christ was born.
``Not even scholar's appreciate the fact that our calendar does
not count from the first year of Jesus, which is unknown, but from
the last year of Herod, which is known. Thus the entire AD/BC
system is based on the reign of the last great Jewish king!''
http://users.zoominternet.net/~matto/Java/ce_and_bce.htm
--
``Could it be that ... political theater is being staged, very much like
the wrestling matches on TV, with the so-called neoconservatives and their
so-called enemies, such as Pat Buchanan, loudly making public statements
intended to convince the opponents of US foreign policy actions that these
actions are the fault of 'the Jews'?'' --Jared Israel/Emperor's Clothes
|
