Re: Boring, trite, politically motivated study; Rudy takes a pass

Rupert wrote:
> On Dec 2, 12:01 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Dec 1, 2:02 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 1, 12:47 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 12:01 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 6:00 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 1:46 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 28, 2:08 am, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 27, 5:52 pm, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.oogachaga.com/downloads/homophobia_and_homo***ual_arousal.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, all the ****wits who play The Queer Game cite that
page.  It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****.  It's *one* study conducted in one of the least
rigorous of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the social sciences.  Its conclusion is not widely
accepted as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sup****ted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Figures you'd fall for that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Ball, you couldn't be being a little bit defensive
here, could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I simply directed your attention to a scientific study;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A crap, pseudo-scientific "psychology" study.  Crap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let's not have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any rubbish about me falling for anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You fell for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is truly unbelievable what a joke you are.
>>>>>>>>>>>> You fell for bull****.  Just admit it.  You are so obsessed
with trying
>>>>>>>>>>>> to bash me that you'll fall for complete and utter bull****
that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> really ought to recognize as bull****.  I can smell your
desperation
>>>>>>>>>>>> from here.
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much,
>>>>>>>>>> You fell for it.  You're easily duped.
>>>>>>>>> You know what, Rudy,
>>>>>>>> I do know what, rupie:  you fell for that bull**** politically
motivated
>>>>>>>> "study".
>>>>>>> Who the hell do you think you're impressing with this pitiful
>>>>>>> buffoonery?
>>>>>> You fell for that bull**** politically motivated "study".  That is
not
>>>>>> in any serious or credible dispute.
>>>>> Actually,
>>>> Actually, the "study" was bull****,
>>> That may well be,
>> It is.
>>
> 
> There's not much point in saying that for the n-th time if you're not
> prepared to offer any kind of argument in sup****t of this contention.
> 
>>> I never said otherwise,
>> By citing it, you said otherwise.  
> 
> Bull****.


No.

> 
>> You're sloppy.
>>
> 
> No, 

Yes.  You're incredibly sloppy.


>>>> and actually, you fell for it.
>>> No.
>> Yes, you fell for it - you fell for a bull**** pseudo-scientific
"study"
>> that lacked any rigor.
> 
> No, I did not Rudy,

Absolutely you did.