Re: Boring, trite, politically motivated study; Rudy takes a pass

Rupert wrote:
> On Dec 2, 12:03 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>>> On Dec 1, 2:03 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>> On Dec 1, 12:48 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>> On Nov 30, 12:02 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 6:12 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 1:46 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 28, 2:08 am, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 27, 5:52 pm, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
http://www.oogachaga.com/downloads/homophobia_and_homo***ual_arousal.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, all the ****wits who play The Queer Game cite that
page.  It's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****.  It's *one* study conducted in one of the least
rigorous of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the social sciences.  Its conclusion is not widely
accepted as well
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sup****ted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Figures you'd fall for that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Ball, you couldn't be being a little bit defensive
here, could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you? :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I simply directed your attention to a scientific study;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A crap, pseudo-scientific "psychology" study.  Crap.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> let's not have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any rubbish about me falling for anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You fell for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is truly unbelievable what a joke you are.
>>>>>>>>>>>> You fell for bull****.  Just admit it.  You are so obsessed
with trying
>>>>>>>>>>>> to bash me that you'll fall for complete and utter bull****
that you
>>>>>>>>>>>> really ought to recognize as bull****.  I can smell your
desperation
>>>>>>>>>>>> from here.
>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, okay, Rudy, what the hell, I'll do it now.
>>>>>>>>>> Try to wash away the stench of desperation?  You can't.
>>>>>>>>>>> You call psychology "one of the least rigorous of the social
>>>>>>>>>>> sciences".
>>>>>>>>>> It is.
>>>>>>>>> Oh yeah, sorry, missed this bit.
>>>>>>>> You miss a lot.  You're slovenly and careless.
>>>>>>> You toss out a cheap shot rather than
>>>>>> Psychology is not a rigorous social science.
>>>>>> You do miss a lot.  You're slovenly and careless.
>>>>> You just reinforced the point
>>>> That you are slovenly and careless - yes, I know, I intended to
>>>> reinforce that point.
>>> You asserted that I am slovenly and careless with absolutely no
>>> argument or evidence in sup****t of this contention.  [snip hundreds of
words of wheeze]
>> It's now a commonplace.  The argument and evidence have been provided
>> many times in the past.
> 
> Then it should be possible to provide a link to just one place where

All your posts.