Re: Boring, trite, politically motivated study; Rudy takes a pass

On Dec 2, 12:01=A0am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > On Dec 1, 2:02 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Rupert wrote:
> >>> On Dec 1, 12:47 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>> On Nov 30, 12:01 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote=
:
> >>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Nov 29, 6:00 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wro=
te:
> >>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Nov 29, 1:46 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
w=
rote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 28, 2:08 am, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>=
 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 27, 5:52 pm, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.oogachaga.com/downloads/homophobia_and_homo***u=
al_arousal.pdf
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, all the ****wits who play The Queer Game cite that
p=
age. =A0It's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bull****. =A0It's *one* study conducted in one of the
leas=
t rigorous of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the social sciences. =A0Its conclusion is not widely
a=
ccepted as well
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sup****ted.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Figures you'd fall for that.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Ball, you couldn't be being a little bit defensive
he=
re, could
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> you? :)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I simply directed your attention to a scientific study;
> >>>>>>>>>>>> A crap, pseudo-scientific "psychology" study. =A0Crap.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> let's not have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> any rubbish about me falling for anything.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You fell for it.
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is truly unbelievable what a joke you are.
> >>>>>>>>>> You fell for bull****. =A0Just admit it. =A0You are so
obsesse=
d with trying
> >>>>>>>>>> to bash me that you'll fall for complete and utter bull****
th=
at you
> >>>>>>>>>> really ought to recognize as bull****. =A0I can smell your
des=
peration
> >>>>>>>>>> from here.
> >>>>>>>>> Thank you very much,
> >>>>>>>> You fell for it. =A0You're easily duped.
> >>>>>>> You know what, Rudy,
> >>>>>> I do know what, rupie: =A0you fell for that bull**** politically
m=
otivated
> >>>>>> "study".
> >>>>> Who the hell do you think you're impressing with this pitiful
> >>>>> buffoonery?
> >>>> You fell for that bull**** politically motivated "study". =A0That
is=
 not
> >>>> in any serious or credible dispute.
> >>> Actually,
> >> Actually, the "study" was bull****,
>
> > That may well be,
>
> It is.
>

There's not much point in saying that for the n-th time if you're not
prepared to offer any kind of argument in sup****t of this contention.

> > I never said otherwise,
>
> By citing it, you said otherwise. =A0

Bull****.

> You're sloppy.
>

No, you are. You talk silly nonsense pretty much all the time.

> >> and actually, you fell for it.
>
> > No.
>
> Yes, you fell for it - you fell for a bull**** pseudo-scientific "study"
> that lacked any rigor.

No, I did not Ball, but why does it lack rigor? Make some kind of
effort to argue the point.