Re: How Sarah Palin Created a Whole New Generation of Vegetarians

Goo - aka "Bumper", aka ****wit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER, 
stupid pig-****ing cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said, 
"How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he 
lied:

> On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 Rudy Y. Canoza wrote:
> 
>> Goo - aka "Bumper", aka ****wit David Harrison, Stupidist SPAMMER,
stupid pig-****ing cracker, cockfighting specialist - woke up and said,
"How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he
lied:
>>
>>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 Rudy X. Canoza wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dragonblaze wrote:
>>>>> On Nov 29, 1:15 pm, "pearl" <t...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> "Rudy Canoza" <pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:f5GdnfjWK7iXvorUnZ2dnUVZ_gidnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>> Fidyl wrote:
>>>>>>>> An Ahimsa ThanXgiving - Fast 2008
>>>>>>> I'm going to eat a lot of turkey this Thanksgiving.  I always do.
>>>>>> 'How Sarah Palin Created a Whole New Generation of Vegetarians
>>>>>> By Martha Rosenberg, AlterNet. Posted November 27, 2008.
>>>>> [snip]
>>>>>
>>>>> I grew up in a farm, and have seen animals slaughtered for food from
>>>>> early age on - around 6-7, I think. Did not make me into a
vegetarian,
>>>>> even though I knew exactly where my dinner was coming from. You see,
>>>>> when the animal was killed with a bullet to its brain, it just went
>>>>> down with no cry of pain, nothing. It was over in a second, and did
>>>>> not create an impression of suffering to me.
>>>> This bull**** claim by the stupid veg people - that if people could 
>>>> witness animal slaughter, it would convert them to vegetarianism - is
an 
>>>> article of faith with them, and it is more than amply disproved by
the 
>>>> experience of people like you.  At one time, nearly everyone who grew
up 
>>>> on farms witnessed animal slaughter, but the incidence of
vegetarianism 
>>>> has always been *lowest* among farm families.  
>>>    So has refusal to take the animals themselves into consideration
>>> Goob. The ONLY people who have reason to oppose considering
>>> the animals' lives, are people who are opposed to their existence.
>>>
>>>> Vegetarianism is 
>>>> overwhelmingly an urban phenomenon, and always will be.  
>>>    So is the refusal and opposition to considering the animals' lives
>>> Goober. People who have been around farm animals can easily
>>> recognise and appreciate the fact that many of them have lives
>>> of positive value Goob, unless they are literally retarded or
something.
>> Nothing to consider, Goo.  "Getting to experience life", in your
*BULL***** cracker wording, is not a benefit to them.  It is not "good" for
the animals that they exist, no matter how pleasant the condition of their
existence.  Period.  This has been proved. 
> 
>     LOL! There is the fact that many of them have lives of positive
> value

Not a fact, and irrelevant even if it were - but it isn't.


>>> Yet even the "best" of you people--a person supposedly close to
>>> getting a PhD in MATH!!!--can't factor the animals into his evaluation
>>> of whether or not it's cruel to *those same* animals for people to
raise
>>> them for food. The "best" of you people can't do what the most
>>> mediocre of farm people can do, Goo.
>> It is not "good" for the animals that they exist, no matter how
pleasant 
>> the condition of their existence. 
> 
>     So you apparently very ignorantly claim

No, it's so.  I have proved it.