Talk About Network

Google





Pets > Animals Ethics Vegetarian > Re: More "vegan...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 3761 of 4060
Post > Topic >>

Re: More "vegan" bull**** about meat "inefficiency"

by Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 29, 2008 at 02:10 PM

Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupid pig-****ing cracker in all Georgia, 
lied and presented no challenge:
> On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Rudy M. Canoza wrote:
> 
>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupid pig-****ing cracker in all
Georgia, lied and presented no challenge: 

No challenge.


>>
>>> Rudy X. Canoza wrote:
>>>
>>>> Goo - ****wit David Harrison, stupid pig-****ing cracker in all
Georgia, lied and presented no challenge: 

No challenge.


>>>>
>>>>>     So which rights for which animals, Goo???
>>>> The animals that do exist - wild animals and some pets, plus a few in

>>>> zoos - would have "rights", in the "ar" scheme of things, not to have

>>>> certain things done to them.
>>>    There would be no domestic animals, including animals
>>> in zoos Goo. 
>> There would be; 
> 
>     We have no reason to believe that 

Yes, of course you do.  You're lying.


>> just no livestock.
> 
>     Why did you choose that one particular thing to be
> honest about Rudy, 

I am always honest, Goo.


>>> All that's left is wild animals. Do you think they
>>> would all have to be removed from fields before they are
>>> plowed? Then again before they are planted? Again before
>>> they are sprayed with any sort of chemicals? Again before
>>> harvest? Every field? Every time? Who do think will do 
>>> it Goo? Where will the animals be taken, Goob? What
>>> will happend to the animals who are already trying to 
>>> survive in the area you have in mind for re-locating all
>>> the ones in all the fields, Goo? What about animals who
>>> need re-locating because of road construction Goo?
>>> Who will deal with all of that and how? What about
>>> in the construction of homes and businesses Goober?
>>> How about in the production of wood and paper products,
>>> Goo? 
>> Most animals would be wild animals.  
> 
>     Why do you want people to believe the misnomer 

You write ****.



>> The idea of animal "rights" would 
>> prevent you from hunting them.
> 
>     So to sum it all up:

To sum it all up, "animal rights" would prevent livestock from existing, 
and would prevent you from hunting wild animals.
 




 1 Posts in Topic:

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
localhost-V2008-12-19 Thu Jan 8 22:21:53 PST 2009.