Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Pets > Animals Ethics Vegetarian > Re: FAQ: ****wi...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 40 of 74 Topic 3740 of 4043
Post > Topic >>

Re: FAQ: ****wit's beliefs

by "Mr.Smartypants" <anybody23@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 23, 2008 at 02:14 PM

On Jun 24, 7:03=A0am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> > On Jun 23, 11:14 am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>> On Jun 23, 8:22 am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>> On Jun 23, 5:43 am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Jun 22, 3:07 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Jun 22, 7:04 am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 21, 8:33 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 21, 1:04 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mr. Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 21, 7:29 am, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 20, 6:34 pm, Dutch <n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 19, 10:16 am, "Mr.Smartypants"
<bunghole-jon..=
..@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 19, 6:06 pm, Rudy Canoza
<pi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <whining snipped>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're like a broken record, you goofy time wasting
=
clown.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too right.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're all wasting time here, some do it with a little
=
style or wit,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> others are just slogging through it. Guess which
categ=
ory you're in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you know I found that funny?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, the way you show it is with an "lol".
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Say something *funny*, for God's sake, Ball.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You wouldn't get it anyway Rupert, you don't appear
to=
 have a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> functioning sense of humor.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's an interesting conclusion to draw.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not really.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My comment about the irony of a satanist
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> complaining about crossposting was worth a snicker,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh yes, most assuredly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good then.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but all you did was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> start droning on about how I didn't understand
satanis=
m. Ron Hamilton is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a nit, Harrison is a nitwit, and you've joined their
s=
tillborn little
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cabal, I guess you're the gnat.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Okay. So you're the only one around here who wastes
tim=
e with style
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and wit. That's very interesting news. Thanks for
clear=
ing things up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't put myself in that category either. I get off
th=
e occasional
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zinger but I'm mainly pretty deadpan. There are groups
=
=A0I post to where
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> people are hilarious. =A0You otoh appear to take
yoursel=
f too seriously,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lighten up a bit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert takes himself seriously?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too seriously
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's Boobs who is SERIOUSLY afraid of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nonsense
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I guess you didn't notice Rupert take a shot at you
b=
ecause you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were taking yourself far too seriously.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He reacted as he did because he has no sense of humour.-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh of course. You're absolutely right. He never laughed
whe=
n stupid
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Boobs said "axiomatizable" was not a real word. He never
la=
ughed when
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> after he proved to Boobs that it *is* a real word, Boobs
st=
ated that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert had used the word inappropriately. He never laughed
=
when Boobs,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> not even knowing if "axiomatizable" was a real word or not
=
believed he
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> was suddenly an authority on it's usage.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No. Rupert never laughed at any of that..............and
if=
 you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> believe any of that, I have a bridge in Brooklyn you may
be=
 interested
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> in.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't take a sense of humor to laugh at someone when
yo=
u catch them
> >>>>>>>>>>>> in a small mistake, especially not when you end up
obsessing=
 about it
> >>>>>>>>>>>> for months at the expense of everything else. That shows
des=
peration. It
> >>>>>>>>>>>> shows a sense of humor when you laugh at yourself, or
apprec=
iate someone
> >>>>>>>>>>>> else's humour.-
> >>>>>>>>>>> A small mistake?
> >>>>>>>>>> Of course, inconsequential, compared to spending your life
pre=
aching
> >>>>>>>>>> that milk is poisonous.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Then why can't Boobs admit that?
> >>>>>>>>>> He doesn't want to.
> >>>>>>>>> Which some of us find just a tiny little bit funny... :)
> >>>>>>>>>>> I find it absolutely
> >>>>>>>>>>> ludicrous that Boobs can tell someone with a Master's in
math=
 that a
> >>>>>>>>>>> math term he used is NOT A REAL WORD, then promptly tell him
=
he used
> >>>>>>>>>>> the word (which Boobs didn't even know existed)
inappropriate=
ly.
> >>>>>>>>>> Great, maybe there's something ironic in there. bfd. It is
tru=
e that
> >>>>>>>>>> it's a ridiculous word to use outside the esoteric language
it=
 comes
> >>>>>>>>>> from. It shows that Rupert lives in an academic bubble..
> >>>>>>>>> We've been over that point. I used the word in the draft of a
p=
aper
> >>>>>>>>> that I ultimately intended to publish in a mathematical
journal=
.. Ball
> >>>>>>>>> claimed I didn't do mathematics anymore, and I posted the
draft=
 of the
> >>>>>>>>> paper for the purpose of refuting his drivel. Then he decided
h=
e'd
> >>>>>>>>> call me a pompous fat **** because he couldn't find one of the
=
words
> >>>>>>>>> in the paper in online Merriam-Webster.
> >>>>>>>>> You find humour value in satanists objecting to crossposting,
I=
 find
> >>>>>>>>> humour value in Ball making a ridiculous clown out of himself
o=
n a
> >>>>>>>>> daily basis. That's the way it goes.
> >>>>>>>> Fine, no skin off my nose. You're wasting your lives, all of
you=
..
> >>>>>>> Well, quite, no skin off your nose.
> >>>>>>> I'm not wasting any more time here than you, and what I do here
i=
s not
> >>>>>>> really relevant to the question of whether I'm wasting my life.
I=
'm
> >>>>>>> working as a maths teacher and working on a Ph.D. thesis, that's
=
what
> >>>>>>> I'm doing with my life at the moment. I have some other plans
and
> >>>>>>> ambitions as well. What I do here is incidental, like spending
ti=
me at
> >>>>>>> the pub.
> >>>>>> I don't think you're wasting "your life", just the part of it
that=
 you
> >>>>>> spend here. There's nothing worthwhile here. A pub would be
infini=
tely
> >>>>>> more enriching. Not only is there no real stimulation or fun
here,=
 there
> >>>>>> isn't even a basis for any legitimate disagreement here any more,
=
just a
> >>>>>> =A0 platform for stale cheap personal insults. There are
thousands=
 of
> >>>>>> newsgroups where interesting people hang out and exchange
interest=
ing
> >>>>>> ideas, where people are funny, where there is actual life going
on=
.. This
> >>>>>> place reminds me of the rotting remnants of a miscarriage.-
> >>>>> Then shouldn't you **** off and stay ****ed off?
> >>>> Why do you feel threatened by my wi****ng something better for you
an=
d
> >>>> the others here?-
> >>> You couldn't say "****" if your mouth was full of it could you?
> >> I'm not part of this *****uous little circle of mutual disdain any
> >> more. I have no desire to 'get' anybody here.
>
> >>> You're only trying to get rid of those who kick your Rudy persona's
> >>> ass on a continual basis much to your embarrassment.
> >> No, he's the first one that should quit this place, and he knows it,
> >> aaev is a cesspool now, there's nothing left of value here, just old
> >> re-re-re-hashed petty grudges.
>
> >> The place is dead, you guys are just ghosts who haven't accepted it
ye=
t.-
>
> > and you're still here trying to get us to leave so you can use your
> > Rudy persona to make an absolute fool of yourself without us here to
> > notice.
>
> My Rudy persona?? Hasn't it dawned on you yet that you are in cahoots
> with a redneck cock-fighting advocate and registered idiot?-


My goodness! I seem to have struck a nerve.
 




 74 Posts in Topic:
FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-19 01:06:02 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-19 10:16:50 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-20 02:45:16 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-20 10:34:48 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-20 04:57:19 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-20 21:29:41 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-20 09:51:13 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-06-20 15:51:09 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 03:04:44 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-20 23:16:10 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 07:17:01 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-21 00:28:09 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 10:27:44 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-21 03:10:02 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 10:33:21 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-21 04:13:51 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 22:22:26 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-21 04:15:22 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 22:57:26 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-21 09:06:16 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 23:04:24 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-06-21 15:30:48 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-21 23:06:00 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-21 17:12:46 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-22 07:04:40 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-21 17:13:48 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-22 07:06:45 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-21 17:26:00 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-22 07:07:56 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-22 05:42:42 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-22 19:30:52 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-22 06:05:28 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-22 19:43:44 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-22 13:58:20 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-22 22:22:13 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-22 16:27:58 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-23 01:14:01 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-23 04:07:12 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-23 21:03:31 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-23 14:14:34 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-24 08:07:49 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-24 10:43:23 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-25 00:03:43 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-06-24 17:32:01 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-25 01:00:49 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-25 04:00:52 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-25 20:55:29 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-06-25 15:47:43 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-26 02:28:42 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-06-25 20:17:08 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-26 05:23:22 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-26 03:09:44 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-26 18:36:27 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr. Smartypants&quo  2008-06-26 15:58:50 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-27 01:27:54 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-26 18:33:49 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-27 05:39:03 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rudy Canoza <pipes@[EM  2008-06-26 22:37:07 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-27 03:27:27 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-28 06:33:15 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-27 03:28:13 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-28 05:34:04 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-28 20:52:01 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-28 14:37:59 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-29 03:59:14 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-29 07:48:03 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-29 19:33:59 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-29 12:59:41 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-29 22:17:48 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
"Mr.Smartypants"  2008-06-29 14:14:09 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-29 22:21:54 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-29 15:28:44 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Rupert <rupertmccallum  2008-06-29 15:31:43 
Re: FAQ: Fuckwit's beliefs
Dutch <no@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-06-30 01:46:23 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 10:32:22 CST 2008.